Riding the Rails
A bus driver’s strike yesterday caused considerable inconvenience (and much CO2 emission). Instead of using train and bus to travel to Waverley for an inspection, I spent much time in very slow moving traffic, all of us spewing out exhaust gas. In the news leading up to the strike, I missed any mention of how this strike contributes to global warming but read how both sides were the personification of compromise; it was all the other side’s bloody-mindedness.
Climate Change – Questioning the Science
I do not doubt that we are experiencing a period of climate change but I question the science. Taking a long-term view, climate change is a cyclical event; taking a short-term view, I cannot determine if the sea level is rising or falling, if temperatures are rising or falling or whether CO2 is the contributing emission, from the information presented in the many sources available. In discussing this with Ken Cameron, he mentioned that:
Climate change as religion looks to me like a mixture of science as a religion, which Mary Midgely writes about so well, and environmentalism as a religion, which has at least a 300-year history. The media coverage of Copenhagen is reaching a crescendo of much ado about nothing. But I do look forward to quality writing about what happened. (E. Cameron, 17 December, email.)
This prompted me to check out Mary Midgley and in the following selective quotes, she describes my knowledge dilemma.
“Mary, Mary, quite contrary”, The Guardian, 13 January 2001, http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2001/jan/13/philosophy
… human life [is] like an enormous, ill-lit aquarium which we never see fully from above, but only through various small windows unevenly distributed around it. Scientific windows – like historical ones – are just one important set among these. Fish and other strange creatures constantly swim away from particular windows… reappearing where different lighting can make them hard to recognise. Long experience, along with constant dashing around between windows, does give us a good deal of skill in tracking them. But if we refuse to put together the data from different widows, then we can be in real trouble.
… distance from academic proprieties comes out in her friendship and admiration for James Lovelock, the originator of the Gaia hypothesis. “She’s so right about science. It is becoming fragmented to such an extent that the average scientist is now a specialist who knows no more outside his specialty than the average layman; and somebody needed to say that.”
But although she often professes to be talking about science, she does draw an equivalence between scientism [applying scientific method inappropriately] and science.
Midgley feels that modern scientists, though they have realised what the urgent problems of the human race are, still talk as if science, or simply increasing knowledge, could solve them. But “If there is one thing that we know from the long and hard experience of the human race, it is that what is wrong is not simple.”
My consideration of Lovelock was posted on 1 December when, through the reasoning of Tim Flannery, I changed my opinion of both Lovelock and Flannery.
Midgley’s logic is in contrast to that of Bill McKibben and other climate change ‘gurus’ and I am moving more to the view we are being shilled by the ‘climate change leads to doom’ priesthood .
See the Wikipedia entry at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Midgley and Midgley, M (2002), Beast and Man, http://books.google.com.au/books?id=g2gu7pRXEPYC&dq=mary+midgley&printsec=frontcover&source=bl&ots=pRSMVJsd2B&sig=ntBDtTIrbTBpPP0nzq0zUncetoU&hl=en&ei=1r0pS-buFo-gkQX25bz4CA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CBEQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=&f=false which has a readable text and enough to prompt a deeper reading of the actual book.
And then we have this
“Scientists ‘crying wolf’ over coral”, The Australian, 19 December, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/scientists-crying-wolf-over-coral/story-e6frg6nf-1225811910634
A SENIOR marine researcher has accused Australian scientists of “crying wolf” over the threat of climate change to the Great Barrier Reef, exposing deep division about its vulnerability.
Today’s Website
A fine interactive graphic but it doesn’t say much too me.
“A Journey Through Climate History”, ABC Science, http://www.abc.net.au/innovation/environment/cc_timeline.html

