On the train Saturday

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is this the Homo Sapiens equivalent of red-arsed monkeys? Is this ‘I want a mate’ signalling or did she get up too late to do this at home?

Sydney trains are useful for anthropological field work. This was going into the City. Coming home an old guy who could barely lift his phone had a long, loud, animated and interesting conversation. Those who resent mobile phone conversations in public should relent a little  — the differently-abled have communication.

The smart phone has given us observers of people a very useful tool. I can take the above while appearing to change my podcast choice — and continue listening.

Christmas Day

Contemplating the ducks -- Sydney Park

Christmas Lights

Christmas

Christmas and Climate

Several day’s late due to a riveting Colleen McCullough, (2009), Too Many Murders, Harper Collins in my Santa Sack – just too good to put down and attend to daily matters such as weblog, dogs, garden, the outside world. The rain was a useful excuse to remain reading until my eyes failed.

We began the birth-celebration at Sydney Park at 07:00 with some family and dogs. Such a great place: the rejuvenation of a rubbish tip into a super and very popular parkscape. And then on to Duncan and Alison’s for a celebratory lunch – a pleasant day.

On Christmas Eve we went to Double Bay for an evening with Kathy and Ken and friends; a splendid time with the fresh southerly sharpening the night. Bringing realism to our enjoyment Ken sent me this comment:

World population 6.2B – (4.2B live in Asia Pacific Region and over 1B people have no electricity – sun and dung)

  • 80 per cent of the world population live on less then $US10 per day
  • 20 per cent of world population have 75 per cent of the wealth
  • It follows that the 80 per cent poor have the other 25 per cent of “wealth” and these are the people who will “save” the world from global warming?

Almost 25 per cent of world population has crap water supply – 2/3 of these people are amongst the poorest on the globe and earn less than $2 per day with 1/3 on less than $1 per day – and these are the people who will “save” the world from global warming?

The Aviation Industry is one of the few global Industries to set ambitious carbon reduction targets. The industry aims to have carbon neutral growth by 2020. This means that the effects of expansion of aviation will be offset by carbon reduction strategies. Consider this in the context of growing economies and perhaps 2 or 3 per cent a year move into the air travel affordability bracket? Three per cent of 4.2B in our area is a big number of aircraft. Between now and 2020 the industry aims for 1.5 per cent reduction in CO2 emissions year on year.

And from “List of countries by carbon dioxide emissions per capita”, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions_per_capita,  which supports Ken’s observations.

Region

Annual tonnes CO2 emissions per person

Qatar

56

USA

19

Australia

18

Denmark

9

New Zealand

7

China

4

India

1

Chad

0

Post-Copenhagen, blame for a non-binding treaty has been laid upon China, India, Sudan and Tuvulu which in view of the above table is quite unfair. These people deserve water, elctricity, longevity and the pleasures we take for granted..

Today’s Podcast

Maintaining the ‘we need to do our part’ theme in reducing pollution is this:

“Not cheap, just frugal!”, FutureTense, 24 December, http://www.abc.net.au/rn/futuretense/stories/2009/2719979.htm

Consumerism could prove a difficult habit to break, but there are those who have already started to change their approach to life. The frugality movement has been with us for some time. So given all the economic woe that’s befallen us, could this be the movement’s time in the sun?


Thursday

Butterfly in the Buddlea

This was taken in April 2004. The current blooms are wispy white with the purple yet to arrive

Riding the Rails

Ugly railways

Why are our railways so ugly? Would more people be tempted to use CityRail if the views were not so full of rubbish?

Climate Change – Where are we?

Copenhagen is over. I thought the most useless activity was Greenpeace people climbing light poles. Or was it the press complaining of being locked out in the cold for 8 hours while the activists caused some security problem?

This email sparked more thinking about where we are in the climate change ‘debate’.

“The Copenhagen backlash begins”, Foreign Policy Review Daily email, 22 December.

Top Story: Just days after countries agreed to a face-saving agreement at the U.N. climate talks in Copenhagen, accusations have begun to fly about who was responsible for the disappointing conference. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva criticized the United States for failing to commit for emissions reductions. South African negotiators, who participated in the drafting of the final agreement, nonetheless attacked it as “not acceptable.”

E.U. environment ministers will meet today to discuss how to proceed in the wake of the Copenhagen “disaster.” Writing in the Guardian on Sunday, British climate secretary Ed Miliband accused China of having “hijacked” the proceedings for its own goals. A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman responded that Miliband’s accusations were just a way “to shirk responsibilities that should be assumed towards developing countries.”

At least one minister seemed happy with how the talks turned out. Indian environment minister Jairam Ramesh told parliament that India had been able to resist international pressure to agree to binding emissions cuts. The markets were less upbeat with carbon prices plunging on the European exchange on Monday.

There is no clarity.

I thought this morning as I walked the dogs and listened to how 37 per cent of Copenhagen’s commuters travel by bicycle, I would attempt a summary of the current situation. But on reading the daily press, snippets of news on the internet and listening to some podcasts I remain perplexed. The attacks are increasingly irrational, the reports increasingly data-free and the analyses more infrequent. The situation is beginning to present the scenario for the arrival of a climate-change Messiah: somewhat akin to Germany in the 1930s, China in the 1940s, Russia in the 1920s.

On the 22 December I selectively quoted Barry Cohen’s interview with a philosopher (which Cohen tended to diminish). If an accomplished philosopher is unable to unravel the twisted threads, what hope have we lay people. Hence my concern that climate-change fascism may be lurking in the wings.


Tuesday

Elaeocarpus reticulatus (Blueberry Ash) at Hyams Beach

Elaeocarpus reticulatus (Blueberry Ash) at Hyams Beach

Riding the Rails

Carlton Station

Climate Change

Some comments extracted from this article:

Barry Cohen, “Abbott taps into a climate of confusion”, The Australian, 22 December, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/abbott-taps-into-a-climate-of-confusion/story-e6frg6zo-1225812552415

More and more people were starting to ask questions because they didn’t understand the issues. They were confused because, while most elite scientific opinion supported human-induced global warming and climate change, some disagreed. Those who asked questions were called climate change sceptics or, worse, deniers. Most, however, were “don’t knowers” who resented being sneered at and patronised by those who had no more qualification to pass judgment on the issue than they did. After my last column, when I confessed I was a “don’t knower”, an old friend called and admitted he was of the same view.

I asked, “Do you know what ETS means?” “Only vaguely,” he replied. “And cap and trade?” “Not a clue.” “How about CPRS [the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]?” “Zilch.” He added, “For a long time I read everything about global warming and climate change, but as the government wasn’t adequately explaining the problem, I stopped reading.”

Now fervent believers in climate change will write off such comments as those of an ignoramus but the gentleman referred to is anything but. He is a professor at one of Australia’s leading universities; true, a professor of philosophy, but I can assure readers he is of above average intelligence, well informed and active on a range of political issues. If the professor has given up trying to understand what the debate is all about it’s not surprising there are many like him.

Technical Note

WordPress 2.9 is now functioning – see my sidebar page “WordPress and Open Source”

Today’s Podcast

“Animal rights”, The Law Report, 22 December, http://www.abc.net.au/rn/lawreport/stories/2009/2764558.htm

Our attitude to animals is contradictory. Many of us share our homes with pets, yet most of us eat meat. The law at least is consistent: animals are property, nothing more.

But US lawyers are trying to push the envelope through the courts: guardians have been appointed for animals and the best interests of the pet considered in family law disputes.

Meanwhile, in Spain the parliament wants to grant legal personhood to primates.


Monday

Note that with the WordPress’s unbelievably sloppy 2.9 upgrade , much of this blog is unreachable until I sort out the mess.
Chained to the locomotive

Chained to the locomotive

Time for action.

Time for action.

Two photos today from the Rising Tide blockade at Newcastle yesterday. The original jpeg’s from the Rising Tide website are excellent, highlighting the sophistication these groups bring to their events (see my comments on Climate Camp, except that the WordPress 2.9 upgrade stuff up stops any checking backwards).

Riding the Rails

Train Repairs at Clyde

Climate Change – Coal

An interesting event in Newcastle yesterday contrasts with ‘pussy’ Greenpeace in Denmark.

“23 arrested after coal train protest”, ABCNews, 20 December, http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/12/20/2776876.htm

The group says their action has been prompted by what they say is the failure of the Copenhagen climate talks. (Rising Tide)

More than 20 people have been arrested after climate change protesters blocked rail lines leading to Australia’s biggest coal export facility. Forty members of the Rising Tide group this morning chained themselves to the rail line at the Kooragang coal terminal in Newcastle as part of a protest against the Copenhagen climate agreement.

The protesters, including an 86-year-old man, also chained themselves to an 8,000-tonne coal train outside the port.  Police managed to remove the last protester after a six-hour standoff. The 23 people arrested were later charged with a total of 45 rail safety offences. They will appear in Newcastle Local Court next month.

“We’re here today protesting the failure of the UN climate talks in Copenhagen, that we believe the rich world wrecked any chance of getting any good agreement out of,” said Rising Tide spokesman, Steve Phillips.

“Copenhagen failure sparks coal terminal blockade”, Rising Tide Australia, 20 December, http://www.risingtide.org.au/

Updates:

4:30pm: The Kooragang rail line has just reopened, 7.5 hours after the blockade began

3:00pm: Police have removed the final protester blockading a coal rail bridge in Newcastle, Australia, more than six hours after protesters shut down the coal delivery line into the world’s biggest coal port.

12:00pm: Police have made their first arrests at a dramatic coal train blockade on a bridge in Newcastle – the world’s biggest coal port.

Three hours into the blockade, police have arrested ten people who were sitting on the rail bridge and refusing to move. Protesters expect the blockade to last for the remainder of the day and perhaps into the night, with a further 15 people still blocking the bridge in difficult to remove positions.

Activists shut down the rail line at 9am this morning to protest the failure of the UN climate talks in Copenhagen to produce a just, effective, and legally binding treaty.

9am, Sunday 20th December 2009, Newcastle Australia: Forty climate activists have closed down the rail line into the world’s biggest coal port this morning, protesting the failure of the UN climate talks in Copenhagen to produce a just, effective, and legally binding treaty.

Twenty five of the diverse group – aged from 19 to 86 years and including a Buddhist priest, and an elected local councillor – are occupying a rail bridge in Newcastle, Australia, and refusing to leave. They have hung large banners reading “Greed wrecked Copenhagen: Now it’s up to us all”, and “You could have done something great.”

And in Copenhagen:

Frank Furedi, “Much ado about nothing in Denmark”, The Australian, 21 December, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/much-ado-about-nothing-in-denmark/story-e6frg6zo-1225812230751

The role of the protesters may be confined to that of extras, but they add colour and drama to the spectacle. They were even given permission to protest inside the Bella Centre and their ability to bring the proceedings to standstill helped to inject dramatic tension into an otherwise tedious event.

The protesters take their activities very seriously. A communique by Greenpeace informs the world that while heads of state were dining, “Greenpeace volunteers were out on the streets of Copenhagen, climbing lampposts (my emphasis) to carry our theme of the day: politicians talk, leaders act”.

In this comic drama, climbing lampposts is presented as an initiative that is morally superior to the diplomatic negotiations. The organisers of this spectacle appear to agree, which is why lamppost climbers are treated as if they are the voice of the people, whose job it is to keep the proceedings real. Outwardly, world leaders defer to their moral authority. That is what British Prime Minister Gordon Brown means when he praises protesters for propelling world leaders.


Sunday

An ant home on the way to Uluru

An ant home on the way to Uluru

Riding the Rails

Ashfield Station

Technical Note

WordPress released their Ver. 2.9 yesterday and after upgrading all I had was a blank screen. Checking the WordPress Installation forum, several dozen users were having difficulties. I ended up moving the current, upgraded but stuffed blog and installing Ver. 2.8.5 (2.8.6 wouldn’t unzip) and gradually moving image and sound and plugin directories into the rolled back installation. I still have no Pages, Comments or Posting Calendar but will eventually sort this out.

Unbelievable that such shoddy programming could be released.

Today’s Podcast

An interesting ‘climate change’ viewpoint.

“Nicholas Stern’s blueprint for a safer planet”, The Book Show, 8 December, http://www.abc.net.au/rn/bookshow/stories/2009/2764746.htm

He is the author of the Stern Review, a 700-page report released in October 2006 and commissioned by the British government which looks at the effect of global warming on the world economy.


Saturday

On our way to Uluru

On our way to Uluru

Riding the Rails

An Intercity at Homebush

A bus driver’s strike yesterday caused considerable inconvenience (and much CO2 emission). Instead of using train and bus to travel to Waverley for an inspection, I spent much time in very slow moving traffic, all of us spewing out exhaust gas. In the news leading up to the strike, I missed any mention of how this strike contributes to global warming but read how both sides were the personification of compromise; it was all the other side’s bloody-mindedness.

Climate Change – Questioning the Science

I do not doubt that we are experiencing a period of climate change but I question the science. Taking a long-term view, climate change is a cyclical event; taking a short-term view, I cannot determine if the sea level is rising or falling, if temperatures are rising or falling or whether CO2 is the contributing emission, from the information presented in the many sources available. In discussing this with Ken Cameron, he mentioned that:

Climate change as religion looks to me like a mixture of science as a religion, which Mary Midgely writes about so well, and environmentalism as a religion, which has at least a 300-year history.  The media coverage of Copenhagen is reaching a crescendo of much ado about nothing. But I do look forward to quality writing about what happened. (E. Cameron, 17 December, email.)

This prompted me to check out Mary Midgley and in the following selective quotes, she describes my knowledge dilemma.

“Mary, Mary, quite contrary”, The Guardian, 13 January 2001, http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2001/jan/13/philosophy

… human life [is] like an enormous, ill-lit aquarium which we never see fully from above, but only through various small windows unevenly distributed around it. Scientific windows – like historical ones – are just one important set among these. Fish and other strange creatures constantly swim away from particular windows… reappearing where different lighting can make them hard to recognise. Long experience, along with constant dashing around between windows, does give us a good deal of skill in tracking them. But if we refuse to put together the data from different widows, then we can be in real trouble.

… distance from academic proprieties comes out in her friendship and admiration for James Lovelock, the originator of the Gaia hypothesis. “She’s so right about science. It is becoming fragmented to such an extent that the average scientist is now a specialist who knows no more outside his specialty than the average layman; and somebody needed to say that.”

But although she often professes to be talking about science, she does draw an equivalence between scientism [applying scientific method inappropriately] and science.

Midgley feels that modern scientists, though they have realised what the urgent problems of the human race are, still talk as if science, or simply increasing knowledge, could solve them. But “If there is one thing that we know from the long and hard experience of the human race, it is that what is wrong is not simple.”

My consideration of Lovelock was posted on 1 December when, through the reasoning of Tim Flannery, I changed my opinion of both Lovelock and Flannery.

Midgley’s logic is in contrast to that of Bill McKibben and other climate change ‘gurus’ and I am moving more to the view we are being shilled by the ‘climate change leads to doom’ priesthood .

See the Wikipedia entry at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Midgley and  Midgley, M (2002), Beast and Man, http://books.google.com.au/books?id=g2gu7pRXEPYC&dq=mary+midgley&printsec=frontcover&source=bl&ots=pRSMVJsd2B&sig=ntBDtTIrbTBpPP0nzq0zUncetoU&hl=en&ei=1r0pS-buFo-gkQX25bz4CA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CBEQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=&f=false which has a readable text and enough to prompt a deeper reading of the actual book.

And then we have this

“Scientists ‘crying wolf’ over coral”, The Australian, 19 December, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/scientists-crying-wolf-over-coral/story-e6frg6nf-1225811910634

A SENIOR marine researcher has accused Australian scientists of “crying wolf” over the threat of climate change to the Great Barrier Reef, exposing deep division about its vulnerability.

Today’s Website

A fine interactive graphic but it doesn’t say much too me.

“A Journey Through Climate History”, ABC Science, http://www.abc.net.au/innovation/environment/cc_timeline.html


Friday

Mt Cockburn, Central Australia

Mt Cockburn, Central Australia

Riding the Rails

Redfern Carriage and Locomotive Workshops

My father was a carriage builder in these workshops in the early 1930s.

Climate Change

A reward of maintaining this weblog is learning  about climate change, rising sea levels, coal, gas, deforestation, drought, genetic modification, food-miles and more; but I read much that tests my credibility. One example is the rising ‘climate change’ star, Bill McKibben who conforms to the ‘religious’ aspect discussed by Freeman Dyson (see 7 December post).

Bill McKibben

Bill McKibben’s Wikipedia page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_McKibben. (I have inserted my comments into his text.)

William Ernest “Bill” McKibben (born 1960) is an American environmentalist and writer who frequently writes about global warming and alternative energy and advocates for more localized economies. Beginning in the summer of 2006, he led the organization of the largest demonstrations against global warming in American history. McKibben is active in the Methodist Church, and his writing is sometimes spiritual in nature. Al Gore wrote in 2007 that “when I was serving in the Senate, Bill McKibben’s descriptions of the planetary impacts… made such an impression on me that it led, among other things, to my receiving the honorific title ‘Ozone Man’ from the first President Bush.” (This is nonsense – what are ‘planetary impacts”?)

McKibben grew up in suburban Lexington, Massachusetts. As an undergraduate at Harvard University (unable to determine what degree), he was president of the Harvard Crimson newspaper (1). Immediately after college he joined the The New Yorker as a staff writer and wrote much of the Talk of the Town column from 1982 to early 1987. He quit the magazine when its longtime editor William Shawn was forced out of his job (some background here would be useful), and soon moved to the Adirondack Mountains of upstate New York.

He currently resides with his wife, writer Sue Halpern and his daughter, Sophie, who was born in 1993, in Ripton, Vermont. He is a scholar in residence at Middlebury College, where he also directs the Middlebury Fellowships in Environmental Journalism (the same as he has written on his website – little environmental substance but includes his many books). He is also a fellow at the Post Carbon Institute (a self-congratulating vehicle promoting doom and carbon tarts).

Awards

McKibben has been awarded both a Guggenheim Fellowship (1993) and a Lyndhurst Fellowship (unable to get any information on this other than several links to go back to Bill). He won a Lannan Literary Award for nonfiction writing in 2000 (verifiable and an award of significance). He has honorary degrees from Sterling College, Green Mountain College, Unity College, the State University of New York, Colgate University, and Lebanon Valley College (linked to the Methodist church but no mention of what degrees).

This is reprinted from http://www.postcarbon.org/blog-post/41961-thank-you-together-we-made

“Thank you – together, we made history”, Posted Oct 25, 2009 by Bill McKibben

Today in New York was one of the most amazing experiences of my life. As I stood in Times Square and watched images flood in from every corner of the world on the big screens, I finally saw what a climate movement looked like — and it looked diverse and creative and beautiful. Please head to www.350.org and spend a few minutes watching the pictures. We need you to feel the strength of this movement, and to see how creative and committed this movement is, all across the planet. It was so sweet to watch the day move around the globe, with thousands upon thousands of pictures appearing, sometimes a dozen a minute! There were photos of climbers high on the glaciers of Switzerland holding 350 banners, of bicycle parades from Copenhagen to San Francisco, of organizers in Papua New Guinea beating their church gong 350 times while churches in Barcelona rang their bells 350 times. Photos of activists protesting coal plants and celebrating wind farms, of students in 350 shirts repairing their flooded homes in Manila, and of thousands of people marching in the streets of Bogota and Kathmandu. Photos of people from different races and classes, religions and nationalities, coming together around a simple and powerful number to save our planet. Thousands took to the streets in Addis Ababa and Mexico City; we had huge parades in places like Togo and Seattle. You were by far the biggest news story on Google, on CNN, on the front pages of newspapers around the planet. And these pictures were seen around the world, in newspapers from Beijing to Boston, on TV stations from New Delhi to New York, and on blogs, social networks, and websites across the internet. Together, we’ve shown the world that a global climate movement is possible and set a bold new agenda for the upcoming United Nations Climate Meetings in Copenhagen this December. The 350 target is the new bottom line for climate action and world leaders must now meet that target. We thought we would be tired after many sleepless nights planning this day, but in fact we’re more energized than ever. We’re preparing to deliver the photos and messages from your events to every national delegation to the United Nations on Monday, and planning to hand the photos to high-level ministers at upcoming climate negotiations in Barcelona and Copenhagen. So if you haven’t uploaded your best pictures from the event yet, please do so right away by sending us an e-mail to photos@350.org with your photos attached, with your City, Country as the subject and the body as the action description. Thank you more than we can possibly say. We’ll (of course) be asking you to do lots more in the weeks ahead — but today, lean back, relax, look through pictures at 350.org, and savor your accomplishment. You were part of what many journalists called “the most widespread day of political action the world has ever seen.” (My emphasis). Together with millions around the world, you made a real difference already — get ready to make much more in the days, weeks and months to come. With hope, Bill McKibben and the whole 350.org Team

As an avid print and internet press reader, how did I miss this ‘sweet’ event?

(1) http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2007/6/4/william-e-mckibben-a-commentator-on/