This was taken in April 2004. The current blooms are wispy white with the purple yet to arrive
Riding the Rails
Why are our railways so ugly? Would more people be tempted to use CityRail if the views were not so full of rubbish?
Climate Change – Where are we?
Copenhagen is over. I thought the most useless activity was Greenpeace people climbing light poles. Or was it the press complaining of being locked out in the cold for 8 hours while the activists caused some security problem?
This email sparked more thinking about where we are in the climate change ‘debate’.
“The Copenhagen backlash begins”, Foreign Policy Review Daily email, 22 December.
Top Story: Just days after countries agreed to a face-saving agreement at the U.N. climate talks in Copenhagen, accusations have begun to fly about who was responsible for the disappointing conference. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva criticized the United States for failing to commit for emissions reductions. South African negotiators, who participated in the drafting of the final agreement, nonetheless attacked it as “not acceptable.”
E.U. environment ministers will meet today to discuss how to proceed in the wake of the Copenhagen “disaster.” Writing in the Guardian on Sunday, British climate secretary Ed Miliband accused China of having “hijacked” the proceedings for its own goals. A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman responded that Miliband’s accusations were just a way “to shirk responsibilities that should be assumed towards developing countries.”
At least one minister seemed happy with how the talks turned out. Indian environment minister Jairam Ramesh told parliament that India had been able to resist international pressure to agree to binding emissions cuts. The markets were less upbeat with carbon prices plunging on the European exchange on Monday.
There is no clarity.
I thought this morning as I walked the dogs and listened to how 37 per cent of Copenhagen’s commuters travel by bicycle, I would attempt a summary of the current situation. But on reading the daily press, snippets of news on the internet and listening to some podcasts I remain perplexed. The attacks are increasingly irrational, the reports increasingly data-free and the analyses more infrequent. The situation is beginning to present the scenario for the arrival of a climate-change Messiah: somewhat akin to Germany in the 1930s, China in the 1940s, Russia in the 1920s.
On the 22 December I selectively quoted Barry Cohen’s interview with a philosopher (which Cohen tended to diminish). If an accomplished philosopher is unable to unravel the twisted threads, what hope have we lay people. Hence my concern that climate-change fascism may be lurking in the wings.










